3 ms·
It's because he's making a cheap shot at a cheap product and contributes nothing to the topic. UPDATE: there are hundreds of "no-name" Android devices running
by radley 14y ago
It's because he's making a cheap shot at a cheap product and contributes nothing to the topic.
UPDATE: there are hundreds of "no-name" Android devices running 4.0, including those HDMI TV sticks you can get in China. Most likely the brand he mentioned didn't make a dent in the statistics.
- enraged_camel 14y agoI didn't interpret it that way. He brings up a very valid point: it is near useless to talk about the rate of adoption for Android versions because of the large variety of devices that use it. He points to an example of such a device. edit to respond to your update: maybe the particular device did not make a dent on it, but you said it yourself: there are a gazillion devices running Android, and many new sales were made over the holidays. We have no idea if the increase in the percentage of new versions was due to new sales or upgrades of existing devices.
- radley 14y agoNaturally it would be both (upgrades & new devices).