3 ms·
I'm working on an app which uses Ember 1.0.0pre-2. Over the past few weeks I've been lazy / busy doing other things so the project was set aside for a bit. I
by hellopat 14y ago
I'm working on an app which uses Ember 1.0.0pre-2. Over the past few weeks I've been lazy / busy doing other things so the project was set aside for a bit. I came back to it yesterday, opened the guide page (http://emberjs.com/guides/ http://emberjs.com/guides/) and noticed it had been updated. I was excited and immediately checked the Router section. The guide reflects a brand new router API, which from what I've read makes it much easier to control the state of your application.
The problem with Ember right now is the documentation doesn't align with the most recent public version, which will confuse the heck out of newcomers and frustrate people who are still learning Ember. You can however, check out master to get the new router implementation.
I'm personally making the jump to the bleeding edge for two reasons:
1. The old router API is very hard to grasp. A lot of unknowns as far as where domain code fits when building your application using the router.
2. I don't want to be stuck struggling to find documentation for an already difficult API to work with.
With all that said, Ember is worth taking a look at as far as an 'improved' MV* experience, but you have to be careful as it is in a state of flux.
- rxcfc 14y agoSorry about this, we're going to be cutting a new release soon so that should resolve this discrepancy.