It hasn't stalled, its just hard to quantify, it can't be strictly measured in press and consumer intelligibility. Likewise, most businesses are not strictly i

It hasn't stalled, its just hard to quantify, it can't be strictly measured in press and consumer intelligibility. Likewise, most businesses are not strictly innovative in a scientific/technological sense, merely in having a clever synthesis of preexisting tech that does something people will pay for. There are a lot of innovative tech / engineering shops being created and or growing each year, but they're a bare fraction of the total number of businesses being created. (And all businesses have a web site these days, so clearly that's not tech ,,:-p ) The kicker is we're kinda already in an amazing future. We actually understand pretty well how much / little we truly know in most endeavors. Sadly, human psychology does get bored and demand ever more exotic novelty. Being innovative in sci-tech and having a self sustaining business With RECURRENT are not often happily wedded, and every successful fusion should be cause for celebration. Likewise its actually really hard to evaluate what IS innovative if you're not a domain expert. Etc etc etc Usual caveat, I'm trying to fix numerical computing at wellposed, so I'm a bit overthinking about innovation always.