I mean, not everything Krugman has written is true, but I think that he makes the best case for returning to sane macroeconomic policy that has, for all of its

I mean, not everything Krugman has written is true, but I think that he makes the best case for returning to sane macroeconomic policy that has, for all of its faults, at least some historical backing. I'm definitely pro-Krugman. If you're interested, there are some particular blog posts about the history of the austerity movement and why it's ridiculous: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/opinion/02krugman.html http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/opinion/02krugman.html -- is a good place to start.