3 ms·
"hopefully" Oh. Not rules then? Well, what rules. How about giving it a rule "children must not die". Apparently we're big on that one. Except, wait, we mean "
by jamieb 14y ago
"hopefully"
Oh. Not rules then? Well, what rules. How about giving it a rule "children must not die". Apparently we're big on that one. Except, wait, we mean "US children must not die", so we can still bomb foreign suburbs where children are known to exist. But then we'll need "children must not die on US soil" because it is still possible that the union of (isa US minor citizen ?x) and (isa-resident baghdad ?x) is non empty and the AI would be unable to act. Of course then we need, "US children must not die except in a car", because otherwise the AI would have to destroy cars.
Ok, so lets abandon rule based AI altogether and model our AI on biological processes like humans. Well humans would never cause mass suffering of other humans. We have laws against it. Oh.
"hopefully"
"Let's play global thermonuclear war!"
- fudged71 14y agoThe only winning move is not to program AI? Here's an interesting discussion about AI, rules, morality, etc. http://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/y9lm0/i_am_luke_muehlhauser_ceo_of_the_singularity/c5tkbry http://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/y9lm0/i_am_luke_...