5 ms·
New Freebox update censors ads by default for 5.5M users
- kondor6c 14y agoI'm sure that this would also reduce traffic on some of nosiest advertisements which would benefit an ISP greatly.
- Lennie 14y agoads don't add up to a lot of traffic for an ISP, video and so on does.
- pavel_lishin 14y agoWithout an option to disable this, or an option to white-list certain things, this is basically just highly targeted censorship.
- mnml_ 14y agoIts possible to disable it but it's enabled by default. Lets see how long they last before Google strike back ! Free has always been in trouble with Google because they don't want to pay for the peering.
- laurentoget 14y agoKnowing the reputation of Xavier Niel, he is gleefully waiting for Google's counter attack.
- martinced 14y agoThis is huge news. ISPs modifying the HTML served is a big issue. I'm not that much of a fan of ads, but disabling ads is crazy. It's not working that well apparently. First thing is: a lot of Google ads are served directly inside GMail (these are the ones I notice the most) and at the top of the result from Google search. If that trafis is over HTTPS I've gat to wonder how Free plans to filter them out. But in any way: Free already wanted to throttle YouTube, which is not OK. If I'm paying Free that much of an amount each month I want my bandwith. I Free cannot provide me the bandwith I want, then I'll go to an ISP who can and who doesn't throttle me.
- Nikkau 14y agoFree isn't modifying HTML, but filtering ads servers IPs.
- twiceaday 14y ago'Censorship' of spam emails is ubiquitous. How is this different from that for an end-user?
- Lennie 14y agoSpam email do not contain any content you want to read. Webdevelopers/contentcreators create content but use ads to fund development of those works.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- jdangu 14y agoThe flip side of net neutrality issues. Don't tamper with my Internet please.
- VeejayRampay 14y agoGood riddance though. I wish other ISPs would follow suit. People do NOT like advertisements, the popularity of AdBlock shows that pretty clearly.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- testimoney 14y agoWell we (web developers) are trying to make the ad experience as best as we can. A lot of websites wouldn't even exist without ads (Google, Facebook etc...). If ads are annoying you, use Adblock, but do not remove ads from every user by default! I work for big startup in the US, and we wouldn't exist without ads.
- baby 14y agoI think they're just doing that to get good publicity (oh Free doesn't show ads on internet? I think I'll sign-up at that ISP!) and also to piss off youtube. They will turn it off by default in a couple weeks/month for sure. Mark my words.
- actionthomas 14y agoThey seems to only want to block Google ads. Free and Google have had issues for a long time about 'who pays for bandwidth'. Google doesn't want to pay, so Free blocks their revenues.
- chriscombs 14y agoFreebox Revolution = 2 M users only !!! 5.5 M users, but 3 M are using the Freebox V5 (the previous version is unable to block ads).