> Yet that's proven not to be the case. You have a proof of that? Care to share? How does one even prove framework X being more secure than framework Y? > W

> Yet that's proven not to be the case. You have a proof of that? Care to share? How does one even prove framework X being more secure than framework Y? > When Rubyists make claims, it's best to doubt what they're > saying, and to question every single detail about it. They have > given themselves a bad reputation for making incorrect > statements. Would you mind to reveal, what kind of -ist you are, and why the -ists you represent make only absolutely true claims? Or can we just agree, that this kind of generalization is silly and pointless?