11 ms·
The valuation is actually quite high and in the range of a lot of web companies. Zipcar is not new and has established revenues and profits. With this buyout th
by jonknee 14y ago
The valuation is actually quite high and in the range of a lot of web companies. Zipcar is not new and has established revenues and profits. With this buyout the company has a 112 P/E, comparable to what Netflix is valued at (116 P/E).
The difference with purely web companies is Zipcar has a lot of fixed costs, if they want to expand to double the amount of users they will have a ton of capex to double the amount of vehicles (yes, you can probably squeeze a few more hours of usage into a car, but like planes there is a fixed number of hours any given vehicle can be generating you revenue per month). Web companies also see infrastructure costs dropping over time while Zipcar sees the opposite (after accounting for economies of scale, cars are not getting cheaper year after year).
- jakarta 14y agoYour argument is pretty flawed. On an ev/ ebitda basis zip car traded close to rental peers pre acquisition, 12x for zip versus 10x for Avis which had a mature business. Zip spends 25% of sales on capex which inflates D&A making net income superficially low and the pe appear ultra high