3 ms·
I dunno. 15 hours in relative comfort might win sometimes over 4 hours of crampedness and annoyance. The bigger question would be price, which I suspect would
by waterlesscloud 14y ago
I dunno. 15 hours in relative comfort might win sometimes over 4 hours of crampedness and annoyance.
The bigger question would be price, which I suspect would be higher than average air fares.
- dalke 14y agoI've tried both, for the Sweden<->Germany route. I've usually been disappointed that the train was more expensive than a flight. The train has much fewer luggage restrictions, but lugging lots of luggage around when changing trains is also a hassle, while with flights they do that for you. With 4 hours of travel, you don't need to worry about food. With 15, you do. Though you can bring a full meal, including drinks and a knife, on the train. Plus, there's AC power for the laptop. My break-even point is at about 6-8 hours by train, vs. a plane. That gets me to Hamburg.