4 ms·
I don't see the purpose and don't have the time to have a long, detailed argument about this, particularly when you have begun by putting the words "during his
by slurgfest 14y ago
I don't see the purpose and don't have the time to have a long, detailed argument about this, particularly when you have begun by putting the words "during his time" in my mouth. The supremacy of Leonardo is contentious and shouldn't be taken as dogma.
If you want to become an excellent engineer or artist then you will probably be better served by getting educated, and logging many hours in progressively more difficult jobs, than procrastinating and dithering.
Anyway, most people don't have the luxury, and will only get anything interesting done if they put in serious focused effort.
- pknight 14y agoI know about Michelangelo and Raphael - both painters, but those three are considered to be in the same tier. I don't know any engineers that were considered better in his day. Da Vinci is obviously famous in the history books so it would be interesting to know more about his peers, especially if they surpass him in certain domains.
- latinohere 14y agoSo basically you are being called out and finding no way to defend your statement now you are acting all high and mighty.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]