7 ms·

Assault Weapons Tracking

13 points by senthilnayagam 14y ago

learc83 14y ago
So you want gun owners to voluntarily add a GPS tracking device that is accessible by third parties to all of their guns? I don't like to outright dismiss projects, but I'm sorry you are never going to get enough people to do this for it to be worth anyone's time. And how is an alarm system going to help if the guy starts firing as soon as he walks in? The vast majority of gun homicides are committed by felons with handguns not unauthorized "assault weapons". GPS trackers are going to be easy for criminals to remove anyway.
- senthilnayagam 14y ago
  This is a voluntary option, for parents and people who dont want their guns to me taken out or misused without their permission. We already have electronic safes and gun safes, adding RFID or NFC based sensor would be practical, we would also need to add a sticker or embed a small chip inside the Gun. if a Gun is removed by unauthorized person it should raise a alarm
  - learc83 14y ago
    If your're talking about an RFID tag that lets the owner know when something has been removed from the safe, I don't think anyone will have a problem with that. However, the site mentions GPS tracking and access to the tracking info by third parties (alerting a school when a tracked gun gets too close). That's a whole different ballgame.
    - senthilnayagam 14y ago
      we might open source a version which is linked to SMS only and which does not talk to a server, it can be done. bringing sensors to school and malls is lot cheaper than having troopers everywhere, but it needs political will
      - angersock 14y ago
        To be somewhat dark here: you don't really need sensors at malls or schools; their utility in the event of a shooting would probably be superseded by discharges or other obvious telltales of a weapon's presence.
      - mgarfias 14y ago
        You know what works better? Responsible armed people willing to confront evil with faced with it.
  - phaus 14y ago
    I understand that you want to help people and save lives, but the reality of the fact is that your target market is going to universally hate your idea and the rationale behind it.
    - senthilnayagam 14y ago
      my belief stems from this link http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-1227-gun-buyback-20121227,0,7293938.story http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-1227-gun-buyback-201... even a couple of percentage adoption can be a big step
      - mgarfias 14y ago
        No, it'd actually be a hindrance (assuming the GPS-alert-school thing is implemented). It would give a false sense of security while doing next to nothing.
      - phaus 14y ago
        Gun buybacks are mostly for publicity. A good amount of the guns are stolen specifically to turn them in for cash. The people who organize these things make it sound like they are there to accept the surrender of a large, violent gang. Also, when a real gang member does sell a gun, chances are he still has at least one at home(like he's gonna change his entire lifestyle for 50 bucks.) Think about it, most guns cost way more than the 50 bucks they were offering for handguns in that article and ar15s average about 1k. Guns maintain resale value in a way that makes apple products look like disposable pens, so why would anyone who didn't steal their gun sell it to these people at a huge loss?
        learc83 14y ago
        The aforementioned LA gun buyback also bought 2 completely useless, already fired, single use rocket launchers and paraded them around the press as if they'd accomplished something. The vast majority of guns turned in are old .22s and shotguns, very few "assault weapons" or even handguns for that matter.
        14y ago
azifali 14y ago
I think it would possible if it becomes a law.
- phaus 14y ago
  While I certainly don't think we'll need to take advantage of the 2nd amendment anytime soon, the purpose behind it is to keep our government honest with the threat of an armed populace. So why would anyone in their right mind give the government the ability to track them using the very instrument that is intended to protect you from them? If such a law were enacted, it would surely be the most idiotic piece of legislation in the history of our nation.
  - azifali 14y ago
    I just moved to the states and clearly, I don't know the laws well enough. If laws can't stop deadly weapons, I guess there has to be another meaningful way to do that.
    - mgarfias 14y ago
      Its already illegal to murder people. Yet people get murdered all the time.
mynameishere 14y ago
You're wasting your time. 3D printers are going to make gun rights as inevitable as your right to download Cat Steven's greatest hits--and approximately as deadly. Just give it up. Also, if it makes you feel better, try to keep in mind that a Ford Escort is more dangerous than a boxful of 357 magnum revolvers, statistically speaking.
- senthilnayagam 14y ago
  for driving a car you need a driving license and you should not be drunk to drive on roads. none of those apply to owning or using a gun
  - learc83 14y ago
    >for driving a car you need a driving license No you don't. You need a driver's license to operate a vehicle on a public road. You don't need one to keep it at home and drive around your backyard/dirt road. Most states require a CCW permit to carry a gun around in public as well.
    - harshreality 14y ago
      Furthermore, vehicles are licensed with the idea that people are going to drive them in public, at dangerous speeds, in close proximity to other vehicles that are also in motion. Guns are carried/licensed with the idea that people are not going to use them in public, except in emergency situations. The law in most places doesn't treat prohibitions as categorical imperatives. If I'm going to be attacked unless I flee on a motorcycle, good luck finding a jury anywhere that will convict me for riding a bike without a motorcycle license. And yet, carrying a gun, without a license, solely so that you can attempt to defend yourself in an emergency situation, will generally get you prosecuted in all but the most gun-tolerant areas[1] if you get caught or if you have to use it... prosecuted for not having a carry permit. (Ignoring unlicensed open carry -- which is legal in a few more places than unlicensed concealed carry is -- because, although I don't want open carry banned, I think it's tactically unsound.) [1] Vermont, Alaska, Arizona so far allow unlicensed concealed carry, and in a few other places the DAs might choose not to prosecute you, but most DAs would at least try to prosecute.
thalecress 14y ago
Ever hear of a booster bag? [1] Faraday cages aren't hard to make. It wouldn't shock me if a gun locker blocked signals too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booster_bag http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booster_bag
- learc83 14y ago
  Simply prying the device off or smashing it with a hammer would also work.
- senthilnayagam 14y ago
  CCTV does not stop crime, but helps in conviction. if Sandy Hook kids had one minute prior notice, atleast half of them would be alive, I am a parent myself with kids in same age group, so every possibility still excite me
  - pliftkl 14y ago
    Didn't the killer shoot the person who would have monitored the firearms first before taking them? So this solution would only be helpful if law enforcement actively tracked the position of all "assault weapons" at all times. And that seems like a bad idea on a variety of levels.
aabbaabb 14y ago
It's a great concept and extremely viable. All you need to do is ask 20 gun owners and you'll get some positives. Don't listen to the naysayers.
- senthilnayagam 14y ago
  we have lot to cover, just of the drawing board, we will build the API,web and mobile interfaces. It needs working closely with manufacturers, parents, authorities and lot of good will to move this. I expect a 80% failure possibility but it is still worth a try.
chrissnell 14y ago
Full disclosure: I'm a hardware hacker and I own many firearms, including so-called "assault weapons". A couple of thoughts here: 1. Keep your firearms in a @$(@$ safe unless you can put your hand on them within a second or two at any given time. If you can't physically control it at all times, it needs to be locked away. 2. Don't give the safe combo to your children or anyone else. Don't let them watch while you open it. 3. Don't buy a crappy safe. Hotel-style 4-digit lock codes won't cut it. 4. Once a weapon is out of the safe and you're not there to witness it, it might as well be stolen. In other words, what you want to watch is the status of the safe's door and not the location of the individual guns. See #1 and #2. 5. There are already many wireless solutions to track door status. That NinjaBlocks appliance on HN the other day comes to mind. I don't want to invest in an entirely separate system. I want something that integrates w/ my existing home security. 6. You're not going to get much milage with the firearms community by calling them "assault weapons". That's a loaded term and I don't like it. Your potential customers are guys like me: considerate, caring people who happen to enjoy shooting guns and who own a few, but want to keep their collections safe. I'm not assaulting anyone and your use of that term is enough to keep me from buying your product. 7. You're wrong about mass shootings. Most, including the most deadly (VA Tech), were committed with handguns, not long rifles.
- mgarfias 14y ago
  Thank you. My first thoughts were a lot less polite.
- chrissnell 14y ago
  Expanding a little more on my #5 point: The secret sauce here is not an API, or a cloud-based service, or SMS messages or any of that. The secret sauce is the hardware that goes inside the safe. Contrary to popular belief, the primary reason to own a gun safe is for fire protection. Many of us have tens of thousands of dollars invested in our guns. Fire is the most probable undesired outcome and so a safe must protect against that. Your hardware device needs to be inside the safe so that it can be safe from tampering, but it /can't compromise the integrity of the fire protection/. Furthermore, it needs to be able to communicate to an outside station. This may be a problem if the device lives inside this big steel box. I hope that you guys don't try to re-invent the wheel. There are already a number of home metrics collectors similar to NinjaBlocks and I would much rather use a platform that I can also use to monitor things like fire detection, home security, electricity usage, environmental conditions, lighting, etc. Build us something that works with most quality safes and have it integrate into the existing systems. Sell us the hardware.
photorized 14y ago
That's just a bad idea all around.
mgarfias 14y ago
I hope you get eaten by a bear.
- mturmon 14y ago
  It's nice to see someone else has such a strong revulsion to poorly worded ad copy on a web site. Grrr!
harshreality 14y ago
First of all, that sketch does not define assault weapons, making me wonder if you've paid any attention to the counterarguments to the "ban assault weapons" hysteria. See: http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/an-opinion-on-gun-control/ http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/an-opinion-on-g... Second, short and vague hand-wavy descriptions are not going to cut it. There's no description of where these trackers would go. There isn't a lot of empty space inside a gun; places where this might go are inside pistol grips or at the bottom of magazine wells, but those are both easily accessible. Furthermore, anywhere these trackers go would have to be accessible. Otherwise, how do you replace the batteries? It would be challenging to design circuitry relying on solder that would stand up to the shock of being attached to a gun that's fired dozens or hundreds of times at a range, or thousands or tens of thousands of times over a typical gun's lifetime. What does your tracking system accomplish? Guns that are stolen are going to be checked for GPS and NFC trackers, which will be removed or disabled. Guns that are bought legally (Cho) for use illegally (VA Tech) are going to have the GPS and NFC trackers removed or disabled, too.
- senthilnayagam 14y ago
  I am not a hardware engineer, never fired a bullet. Your points are very valid, All I can build is couple of prototype which can prove it can be done. it might be flawed, defective whatever. I dont know how it can be done, but there must be someone somewhere who can take these challenges and come up with a solution.
  - mgarfias 14y ago
    The problems you'll run into when trying a GPS solution: 1) packaging. LIke someone else said, there isn't a lot of room on your typical firearm to hide such things. You'll be left with something like a wall-wart that is completely obvious. 2) battery life. some of my rifles haven't left the safe in a year, you really going to have a battery that keeps the device powered that long?
  - roboneal 14y ago
    In summary: You've registered a domain name, spent 3 weeks noodling the problem since Sandy Hook, have no hardware engineering background, and have never fired a gun. Why is this on HackerNews?
angersock 14y ago
A much, much more palatable version of this would be a simple local RFID tag that communicates with a fob in the safe, and which signals when a firearm is removed from said safe--that is, after all, the MVP for the problem you claim to want to solve. Adding GPS is overkill, plays right into wingnut fantasies of the evil gubbernment man tracking their guns, and most of all is useless once I peel the damn thing off the weapon. Start simple, use an RFID tag. Oh, and check the copy on your site.
roboneal 14y ago
Let's assume you get past the obvious problems like politics, privacy concerns, massive improvements in battery technology to implement GPS tracking of guns, etc. With the estimated 200 Million privately owned firearms in the United States alone, you seem to have a 20 Trillion dollar ($100 a firearm) problem to solve. That's greater than the US debt (at the moment) and the entire US GDP for the most recent year. Emotional impact aside, there are a lot more serious problems that could be solved with that kind of money that impact more people with greater efficacy
- learc83 14y ago
  You're correct. Second hand smoking kills 42,000 people each year in the United States alone [1]. More than 3 times as many as homicide by firearm. Furthermore second hand smoking in Britain (more common than the US) kills about 5 times as many people per capita as do firearms in the US [2]. [1] http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/21/the-major-toll-of-secondhand-smoke/ http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/21/the-major-toll-of-seco... [2]http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/smokingandtobacco/passivesmoking/smoking-and-cancer-secondhand-smoke http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/sm...
  - senthilnayagam 14y ago
    it takes years to die as a second hand smoker, even the smokers ten to live on for decades. but bullets are swift like cyanide, intended to kill and do kill for sure
    - mgarfias 14y ago
      Not really. Rifles at close range do tend to end people quite badly - providing the bullet fragments or expands. There are many tales from Iraq/Afghanistan where this isn't happening with the 5.56mm NATO. And pistols really only kill about 25% of the time. Remember that in order to kill a human with a normal pistol, your target is the size of a pair of ten is balls separated by 18" of rebar. Hit the brainstem, heart, or spinal column and the target goes down NOW. Miss that, and all sorts of odd things can happen, including living through the hit.
roboneal 14y ago
So your idea solves the problem of someone "cracking" or knowing the combination to my gun safe and removing the gun without my knowledge? Please explain how many of mass shootings over the last 15 years or so this would have prevented?
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
azifali 14y ago
What if this was an open source project with do it yourself hardware + software that alerts you on your phone when guns are taken out of a certain range. Does this excite anyone?
bvchandru 14y ago
How about a simple RFID sensor solution that can be used detect arms being carried into public places like malls, Schools, religious places, conventions etc. were we have most of the public mass killing being reported/targeted. This would be just like RFID sensors used on merchandise's from being shoplifted. only that conceptually the sensor has to work in reverse from preventing objected materials being carried into the premises.
- senthilnayagam 14y ago
  we are thinking in same lines, but all the guns need to be first tagged with them, which is who will bell the cat
  - bvchandru 14y ago
    why not take a cue from auto industry and have a recall campaign for existing one's. It should be default for new ones!
dcgibbons 14y ago
You're going to need a lot of perseverance to get a project like this done, so if nothing else this project will teach you a lot of patience with people who don't believe in your idea. You can get a prototype really easy: get an Arduino platform and some sensors and then work on your back-end. With about $100 in parts you can prove out a lot of your overall idea. Visit https://www.adafruit.com/ https://www.adafruit.com/ - you don't need to have any hardware experience to get something functional in just a few hours or days; this stuff is easy to learn. If you have the ability to objectively analyze results, you'll quickly realize your project is a) recreating wheels that already exist, b) utterly pointless. Anyone intent on doing evil will be able to destroy or suppress any sensor added or built-into a gun. Mass-murders are not done on a whim - they plan and have plenty of time to figure out ways around obstacles. Yes, some obstacles will undoubtedly deter some people, but with everything there is a cost / benefit analysis that must be done. You will find in this debate that people, on both sides of the issue, will use every statistically correlation as a causation to support their point. Factual, proven data is very hard to come by without a bias: I'm pretty sure I could statistically prove that mass murders are directly related to the availability of avocados. Weapon-smithing and ammunition production is easy with modern tools and is just getting easier. Even casings for ammunition is easy with simple machine tools. As others have mentioned, with 3D printing technology advancing printing guns from scratch is effectively here today and will only get better.

So you want gun owners to voluntarily add a GPS tracking device that is accessible by third parties to all of their guns? I don't like to outright dismiss projects, but I'm sorry you are never going to get enough people to do this for it to be worth anyone's time. And how is an alarm system going to help if the guy starts firing as soon as he walks in? The vast majority of gun homicides are committed by felons with handguns not unauthorized "assault weapons". GPS trackers are going to be easy for criminals to remove anyway.

senthilnayagam 14y ago
This is a voluntary option, for parents and people who dont want their guns to me taken out or misused without their permission. We already have electronic safes and gun safes, adding RFID or NFC based sensor would be practical, we would also need to add a sticker or embed a small chip inside the Gun. if a Gun is removed by unauthorized person it should raise a alarm
- learc83 14y ago
  If your're talking about an RFID tag that lets the owner know when something has been removed from the safe, I don't think anyone will have a problem with that. However, the site mentions GPS tracking and access to the tracking info by third parties (alerting a school when a tracked gun gets too close). That's a whole different ballgame.
  - senthilnayagam 14y ago
    we might open source a version which is linked to SMS only and which does not talk to a server, it can be done. bringing sensors to school and malls is lot cheaper than having troopers everywhere, but it needs political will
    - angersock 14y ago
      To be somewhat dark here: you don't really need sensors at malls or schools; their utility in the event of a shooting would probably be superseded by discharges or other obvious telltales of a weapon's presence.
    - mgarfias 14y ago
      You know what works better? Responsible armed people willing to confront evil with faced with it.
- phaus 14y ago
  I understand that you want to help people and save lives, but the reality of the fact is that your target market is going to universally hate your idea and the rationale behind it.
  - senthilnayagam 14y ago
    my belief stems from this link http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-1227-gun-buyback-20121227,0,7293938.story http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-1227-gun-buyback-201... even a couple of percentage adoption can be a big step
    - mgarfias 14y ago
      No, it'd actually be a hindrance (assuming the GPS-alert-school thing is implemented). It would give a false sense of security while doing next to nothing.
    - phaus 14y ago
      Gun buybacks are mostly for publicity. A good amount of the guns are stolen specifically to turn them in for cash. The people who organize these things make it sound like they are there to accept the surrender of a large, violent gang. Also, when a real gang member does sell a gun, chances are he still has at least one at home(like he's gonna change his entire lifestyle for 50 bucks.) Think about it, most guns cost way more than the 50 bucks they were offering for handguns in that article and ar15s average about 1k. Guns maintain resale value in a way that makes apple products look like disposable pens, so why would anyone who didn't steal their gun sell it to these people at a huge loss?
      - learc83 14y ago
        The aforementioned LA gun buyback also bought 2 completely useless, already fired, single use rocket launchers and paraded them around the press as if they'd accomplished something. The vast majority of guns turned in are old .22s and shotguns, very few "assault weapons" or even handguns for that matter.
      - 14y ago

azifali 14y ago

I think it would possible if it becomes a law.

phaus 14y ago
While I certainly don't think we'll need to take advantage of the 2nd amendment anytime soon, the purpose behind it is to keep our government honest with the threat of an armed populace. So why would anyone in their right mind give the government the ability to track them using the very instrument that is intended to protect you from them? If such a law were enacted, it would surely be the most idiotic piece of legislation in the history of our nation.
- azifali 14y ago
  I just moved to the states and clearly, I don't know the laws well enough. If laws can't stop deadly weapons, I guess there has to be another meaningful way to do that.
  - mgarfias 14y ago
    Its already illegal to murder people. Yet people get murdered all the time.

mynameishere 14y ago

You're wasting your time. 3D printers are going to make gun rights as inevitable as your right to download Cat Steven's greatest hits--and approximately as deadly. Just give it up. Also, if it makes you feel better, try to keep in mind that a Ford Escort is more dangerous than a boxful of 357 magnum revolvers, statistically speaking.

senthilnayagam 14y ago
for driving a car you need a driving license and you should not be drunk to drive on roads. none of those apply to owning or using a gun
- learc83 14y ago
  >for driving a car you need a driving license No you don't. You need a driver's license to operate a vehicle on a public road. You don't need one to keep it at home and drive around your backyard/dirt road. Most states require a CCW permit to carry a gun around in public as well.
  - harshreality 14y ago
    Furthermore, vehicles are licensed with the idea that people are going to drive them in public, at dangerous speeds, in close proximity to other vehicles that are also in motion. Guns are carried/licensed with the idea that people are not going to use them in public, except in emergency situations. The law in most places doesn't treat prohibitions as categorical imperatives. If I'm going to be attacked unless I flee on a motorcycle, good luck finding a jury anywhere that will convict me for riding a bike without a motorcycle license. And yet, carrying a gun, without a license, solely so that you can attempt to defend yourself in an emergency situation, will generally get you prosecuted in all but the most gun-tolerant areas[1] if you get caught or if you have to use it... prosecuted for not having a carry permit. (Ignoring unlicensed open carry -- which is legal in a few more places than unlicensed concealed carry is -- because, although I don't want open carry banned, I think it's tactically unsound.) [1] Vermont, Alaska, Arizona so far allow unlicensed concealed carry, and in a few other places the DAs might choose not to prosecute you, but most DAs would at least try to prosecute.

thalecress 14y ago

Ever hear of a booster bag? [1] Faraday cages aren't hard to make. It wouldn't shock me if a gun locker blocked signals too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booster_bag http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booster_bag

learc83 14y ago
Simply prying the device off or smashing it with a hammer would also work.
senthilnayagam 14y ago
CCTV does not stop crime, but helps in conviction. if Sandy Hook kids had one minute prior notice, atleast half of them would be alive, I am a parent myself with kids in same age group, so every possibility still excite me
- pliftkl 14y ago
  Didn't the killer shoot the person who would have monitored the firearms first before taking them? So this solution would only be helpful if law enforcement actively tracked the position of all "assault weapons" at all times. And that seems like a bad idea on a variety of levels.

aabbaabb 14y ago

It's a great concept and extremely viable. All you need to do is ask 20 gun owners and you'll get some positives. Don't listen to the naysayers.

senthilnayagam 14y ago
we have lot to cover, just of the drawing board, we will build the API,web and mobile interfaces. It needs working closely with manufacturers, parents, authorities and lot of good will to move this. I expect a 80% failure possibility but it is still worth a try.

chrissnell 14y ago

Full disclosure: I'm a hardware hacker and I own many firearms, including so-called "assault weapons". A couple of thoughts here: 1. Keep your firearms in a @$(@$ safe unless you can put your hand on them within a second or two at any given time. If you can't physically control it at all times, it needs to be locked away. 2. Don't give the safe combo to your children or anyone else. Don't let them watch while you open it. 3. Don't buy a crappy safe. Hotel-style 4-digit lock codes won't cut it. 4. Once a weapon is out of the safe and you're not there to witness it, it might as well be stolen. In other words, what you want to watch is the status of the safe's door and not the location of the individual guns. See #1 and #2. 5. There are already many wireless solutions to track door status. That NinjaBlocks appliance on HN the other day comes to mind. I don't want to invest in an entirely separate system. I want something that integrates w/ my existing home security. 6. You're not going to get much milage with the firearms community by calling them "assault weapons". That's a loaded term and I don't like it. Your potential customers are guys like me: considerate, caring people who happen to enjoy shooting guns and who own a few, but want to keep their collections safe. I'm not assaulting anyone and your use of that term is enough to keep me from buying your product. 7. You're wrong about mass shootings. Most, including the most deadly (VA Tech), were committed with handguns, not long rifles.

mgarfias 14y ago
Thank you. My first thoughts were a lot less polite.
chrissnell 14y ago
Expanding a little more on my #5 point: The secret sauce here is not an API, or a cloud-based service, or SMS messages or any of that. The secret sauce is the hardware that goes inside the safe. Contrary to popular belief, the primary reason to own a gun safe is for fire protection. Many of us have tens of thousands of dollars invested in our guns. Fire is the most probable undesired outcome and so a safe must protect against that. Your hardware device needs to be inside the safe so that it can be safe from tampering, but it /can't compromise the integrity of the fire protection/. Furthermore, it needs to be able to communicate to an outside station. This may be a problem if the device lives inside this big steel box. I hope that you guys don't try to re-invent the wheel. There are already a number of home metrics collectors similar to NinjaBlocks and I would much rather use a platform that I can also use to monitor things like fire detection, home security, electricity usage, environmental conditions, lighting, etc. Build us something that works with most quality safes and have it integrate into the existing systems. Sell us the hardware.

photorized 14y ago

That's just a bad idea all around.

mgarfias 14y ago

I hope you get eaten by a bear.

mturmon 14y ago
It's nice to see someone else has such a strong revulsion to poorly worded ad copy on a web site. Grrr!

harshreality 14y ago

First of all, that sketch does not define assault weapons, making me wonder if you've paid any attention to the counterarguments to the "ban assault weapons" hysteria. See: http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/an-opinion-on-gun-control/ http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/an-opinion-on-g... Second, short and vague hand-wavy descriptions are not going to cut it. There's no description of where these trackers would go. There isn't a lot of empty space inside a gun; places where this might go are inside pistol grips or at the bottom of magazine wells, but those are both easily accessible. Furthermore, anywhere these trackers go would have to be accessible. Otherwise, how do you replace the batteries? It would be challenging to design circuitry relying on solder that would stand up to the shock of being attached to a gun that's fired dozens or hundreds of times at a range, or thousands or tens of thousands of times over a typical gun's lifetime. What does your tracking system accomplish? Guns that are stolen are going to be checked for GPS and NFC trackers, which will be removed or disabled. Guns that are bought legally (Cho) for use illegally (VA Tech) are going to have the GPS and NFC trackers removed or disabled, too.

senthilnayagam 14y ago
I am not a hardware engineer, never fired a bullet. Your points are very valid, All I can build is couple of prototype which can prove it can be done. it might be flawed, defective whatever. I dont know how it can be done, but there must be someone somewhere who can take these challenges and come up with a solution.
- mgarfias 14y ago
  The problems you'll run into when trying a GPS solution: 1) packaging. LIke someone else said, there isn't a lot of room on your typical firearm to hide such things. You'll be left with something like a wall-wart that is completely obvious. 2) battery life. some of my rifles haven't left the safe in a year, you really going to have a battery that keeps the device powered that long?
- roboneal 14y ago
  In summary: You've registered a domain name, spent 3 weeks noodling the problem since Sandy Hook, have no hardware engineering background, and have never fired a gun. Why is this on HackerNews?

angersock 14y ago

A much, much more palatable version of this would be a simple local RFID tag that communicates with a fob in the safe, and which signals when a firearm is removed from said safe--that is, after all, the MVP for the problem you claim to want to solve. Adding GPS is overkill, plays right into wingnut fantasies of the evil gubbernment man tracking their guns, and most of all is useless once I peel the damn thing off the weapon. Start simple, use an RFID tag. Oh, and check the copy on your site.

roboneal 14y ago

Let's assume you get past the obvious problems like politics, privacy concerns, massive improvements in battery technology to implement GPS tracking of guns, etc. With the estimated 200 Million privately owned firearms in the United States alone, you seem to have a 20 Trillion dollar ($100 a firearm) problem to solve. That's greater than the US debt (at the moment) and the entire US GDP for the most recent year. Emotional impact aside, there are a lot more serious problems that could be solved with that kind of money that impact more people with greater efficacy

learc83 14y ago
You're correct. Second hand smoking kills 42,000 people each year in the United States alone [1]. More than 3 times as many as homicide by firearm. Furthermore second hand smoking in Britain (more common than the US) kills about 5 times as many people per capita as do firearms in the US [2]. [1] http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/21/the-major-toll-of-secondhand-smoke/ http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/21/the-major-toll-of-seco... [2]http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/smokingandtobacco/passivesmoking/smoking-and-cancer-secondhand-smoke http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/sm...
- senthilnayagam 14y ago
  it takes years to die as a second hand smoker, even the smokers ten to live on for decades. but bullets are swift like cyanide, intended to kill and do kill for sure
  - mgarfias 14y ago
    Not really. Rifles at close range do tend to end people quite badly - providing the bullet fragments or expands. There are many tales from Iraq/Afghanistan where this isn't happening with the 5.56mm NATO. And pistols really only kill about 25% of the time. Remember that in order to kill a human with a normal pistol, your target is the size of a pair of ten is balls separated by 18" of rebar. Hit the brainstem, heart, or spinal column and the target goes down NOW. Miss that, and all sorts of odd things can happen, including living through the hit.

roboneal 14y ago

So your idea solves the problem of someone "cracking" or knowing the combination to my gun safe and removing the gun without my knowledge? Please explain how many of mass shootings over the last 15 years or so this would have prevented?

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

azifali 14y ago

What if this was an open source project with do it yourself hardware + software that alerts you on your phone when guns are taken out of a certain range. Does this excite anyone?

bvchandru 14y ago

How about a simple RFID sensor solution that can be used detect arms being carried into public places like malls, Schools, religious places, conventions etc. were we have most of the public mass killing being reported/targeted. This would be just like RFID sensors used on merchandise's from being shoplifted. only that conceptually the sensor has to work in reverse from preventing objected materials being carried into the premises.

senthilnayagam 14y ago
we are thinking in same lines, but all the guns need to be first tagged with them, which is who will bell the cat
- bvchandru 14y ago
  why not take a cue from auto industry and have a recall campaign for existing one's. It should be default for new ones!

dcgibbons 14y ago

You're going to need a lot of perseverance to get a project like this done, so if nothing else this project will teach you a lot of patience with people who don't believe in your idea. You can get a prototype really easy: get an Arduino platform and some sensors and then work on your back-end. With about $100 in parts you can prove out a lot of your overall idea. Visit https://www.adafruit.com/ https://www.adafruit.com/ - you don't need to have any hardware experience to get something functional in just a few hours or days; this stuff is easy to learn. If you have the ability to objectively analyze results, you'll quickly realize your project is a) recreating wheels that already exist, b) utterly pointless. Anyone intent on doing evil will be able to destroy or suppress any sensor added or built-into a gun. Mass-murders are not done on a whim - they plan and have plenty of time to figure out ways around obstacles. Yes, some obstacles will undoubtedly deter some people, but with everything there is a cost / benefit analysis that must be done. You will find in this debate that people, on both sides of the issue, will use every statistically correlation as a causation to support their point. Factual, proven data is very hard to come by without a bias: I'm pretty sure I could statistically prove that mass murders are directly related to the availability of avocados. Weapon-smithing and ammunition production is easy with modern tools and is just getting easier. Even casings for ammunition is easy with simple machine tools. As others have mentioned, with 3D printing technology advancing printing guns from scratch is effectively here today and will only get better.