> For now they really only saved $300k/yr, which is less than the cost of two engineers. It took them 2 weeks to implement. That means it's saved a lot more th

> For now they really only saved $300k/yr, which is less than the cost of two engineers. It took them 2 weeks to implement. That means it's saved a lot more than it took to implement (2 weeks times a couple of engineers) already. To use your metric, if they saved close to $300K/year, that means they could afford to add 2 engineers to their staff, which is very significant.