> If you're looking at scizophrenics then by definition you're looking at the ones who haven't recovered. Well, yes, it's really easy to say that a disease doe

> If you're looking at scizophrenics then by definition you're looking at the ones who haven't recovered. Well, yes, it's really easy to say that a disease doesn't exist if you ignore all the people who are suffering from it. > they don't just do better because they're given less drugs, it's also because of social differences in terms of how families interact with each other. What "social differences"? Schizophrenics in India are far more likely to go undiagnosed and untreated, which only exacerbates the problems for them and their families. That's a big difference from saying that there's a high recovery rate, let alone that it's not a disease.