4 ms·
Good point. The corporate hierarchy is inspired by the military structure, but incompetently implemented, badly defined, and never legitimated.
by michaelochurch 14y ago
Good point. The corporate hierarchy is inspired by the military structure, but incompetently implemented, badly defined, and never legitimated.
- zanny 14y agoI think it was legitimized by having it happen in pretty much every big company ever. It is the "I made this company (or weaseled by way onto the board / highest layer of management), I'm boss, I don't want to hear from anyone else how I do things because its mine, I have the power, obey me. It comes off as very 3 year old immaturity.
- michaelochurch 14y agoI call that TWiGs management. Toddlers WIth GunS. When I say that it's not legitimated, I'm not saying that it's illegitimate philosophically (although I think it is) but that such managers do a poor job of convincing other people that their power is legitimate. In the military, most people buy in to the rank system. A major component of the abuse inflicted in basic training is to tear someone's ego down and build the person back up again as someone who can take orders. The result is that a lot of them come out of the process genuinely believing that the commanding officer's power is legitimate. In most companies, nothing happens to convince the grunts that the managerial power is legitimate, since most managers are puppet leaders rather than the leaders that the group would pick.
- zanny 14y ago> but that such managers do a poor job of convincing other people that their power is legitimate. Don't they convince their shareholders? These companies keep making it big even with tremendous overhead of useless management and they seem to do it by pitching investors and locking down markets.