4 ms·
I think what you say is true. However, that appears to support the premise that having a management structure actually is more effective. Imagine how hard it
by charlieflowers 14y ago
I think what you say is true.
However, that appears to support the premise that having a management structure actually is more effective.
Imagine how hard it would be to run a company if 200 people had to agree on every little decision. Ever been on any kind of committee? If everything had to go through committee, very few businesses could prosper.
So having a management layer lets the owner select, over time, those people that he wants to share in the decision making. And that seems like a solid benefit of maintaining a management layer.
Whereas Chomsky/Noble seemed to be saying (if I understood them correctly) that the management layer was actually a detriment, but that business owners chose it to maintain class separation.
- Kroem3r 14y agoThis is a concern that's very often raised. I get the point, but there are two things to keep in mind: Having aligned interests makes this tractable. When someone raises this concern they typically posit participants who don't have aligned interests. Secondly, we aren't very good at seeing our day-to-day experience that suggests this is doable. We don't credit our participation in consensus-based groups, nor do we recognize instances of compromising or actions that are not self-interested.