3 ms·
I don't disagree with your premise in general....but...The silliness of one rule doesn't, in my mind, invalidate all the other ones. I mean, couldn't you revers
by jkat 14y ago
I don't disagree with your premise in general....but...The silliness of one rule doesn't, in my mind, invalidate all the other ones. I mean, couldn't you reverse your logic? Find a rule that makes sense (say, no smoking on the plane) and thus summarize that all rules make sense?
I keep thinking to myself that flying is a privilege, not a right. But that's probably more a reflection of my own authoritarian views than anything else. Cheers.
- swombat 14y agoYou're absolutely right, and I didn't say they were all invalidated. All that the silliness of one rule means is that we have to make our own minds up as to which rules are sensible and which are silly. Which was basically my point.