4 ms·
Sorry for the confusion, that wasn't my point. The issue isn't that there would be a ton of research to wade through, the issue is that scientists whose researc
by archgoon 14y ago
Sorry for the confusion, that wasn't my point. The issue isn't that there would be a ton of research to wade through, the issue is that scientists whose research didn't pan now have a track record of failure. I can easily imagine a academic position hiring conversation going like "This guy has a higher failure to success ratio than average, and his successful projects aren't above average."
EDIT:
But perhaps I'm being too cynical (must be the New Year). Such a journal has been constructed.
http://www.jnrbm.com/ http://www.jnrbm.com/
With luck, it will be wildly (un)successful :).