4 ms·
It used to mean that. A long, long time ago. Not for several centuries. Now, don’t get me wrong, the etymology of words is intensely interesting. It always mak
by arrrg 14y ago
It used to mean that. A long, long time ago. Not for several centuries.
Now, don’t get me wrong, the etymology of words is intensely interesting. It always makes me happy to learn how words were originally used and how that meaning changed – but all that doesn’t help you decide what a word actually means right now.
- monochromatic 14y agoThe fact that people still argue argue about the only-several-centuries-old newfangled meaning of this word signifies to me that I probably shouldn't use it in my writing. If I use it to mean "reduce by one tenth" most of my readers will be confused; if I use it to mean "destroy," a vocal minority will be annoyed.
- arrrg 14y agoUhm, no you do not get to move the goal posts. Argue against using the word. Don’t dare argue that it has a different meaning than it actually has. Also, I think I will increase my use of decimate. If it pisses off those annoying pedants (who are perfectly aware of what is being communicated and won’t be the slightest bit confused) I will be happy. I successfully communicated and pissed off people I don’t like. Yay!
- monochromatic 14y ago> people I don’t like But I like you...
- chimeracoder 14y ago> I successfully communicated and pissed off people I don’t like. Yay! You'll make a lot of friends with that attitude.
- arrrg 14y agoOh, I don’t want to be friends with people who are pedants about stuff like this.