5 ms·
Just to give you an impression of how small it is, xterm 64K LOC rxvt 32K LOC st 3K LOC (these numbers ain't precise)
by klrr 14y ago
Just to give you an impression of how small it is,
xterm 64K LOC
rxvt 32K LOC
st 3K LOC
(these numbers ain't precise)
- guilloche 14y agoAmazing and I am also a fan of suckless.org. I am using dwm, dmenu, sic and st now. The binary size of st, rxvt and xterm are 184k, 2.7M and 640k (on x86_64 arch, not accurate). What's wrong with rxvt's binary size? st's binary size is not so small compared to its LOC.
- vidarh 14y agoPerhaps your rxvt is statically linked? Mine is 104K (Ubuntu 12.04, x86_64) vs. 424K for xterm.
- MatthewPhillips 14y ago* Not including the Haskell runtime.
- klrr 14y agoThe suckless community are die hard fans of the good old UNIX and C. They only release projects written in C and RC(a bourne shell clone ported from plan9).
- micampe 14y agoHaskell? I doubt the Suckless guys are using Haskell. http://git.suckless.org/st/tree/st.c http://git.suckless.org/st/tree/st.c
- derleth 14y ago> * Not including the Haskell runtime. Where did you get the impression Haskell was involved in any way here?