3 ms·

Those categories are artificial. What about a bot finding patches to send but with a human review? And an army of humans sending spam PRs like they create fake

• nnq 14y ago
  (3) is artificial, at least for now. But I will always want to see the difference between: 1. Pull request or issues file by real human being for non-advertising purposes (using the equivalent of a "spam filter" for them) 2. Any other stuff! - I want this labeled as "something else", regardless if it useful or spammy real bots or "human-bots" sending me adds. It's a great future what the gp suggests, and I want it, but for now I want a clear distinction between "ham" and "spam", and for now it's probably better to separate "really human made content that's not advertising" and call everything else "possibly spam". If the need appears, they can start filtering the real spam. For now I just want everything that doesn't directly come from a human labeled as "bot pull requests" or "bot issues" or anything else, but labeled!