4 ms·
But if you're that next city and you don't take from the middle classes and give to the poor then you already have no money to spend on those things. And what's
by d4nt 14y ago
But if you're that next city and you don't take from the middle classes and give to the poor then you already have no money to spend on those things. And what's more, the poor will probably now vote in someone who will take from the middle classes. So I think things will bump around at some middle point much like they do today.
- AnthonyMouse 14y ago>But if you're that next city and you don't take from the middle classes and give to the poor then you already have no money to spend on those things. Which is ostensibly what the majority in that city wanted, because they voted for officials who set things up that way. And then once that happens, the people who want things that way (i.e. the middle class) from other cities move to that city, and the people who don't (the poor) leave for some other place, which bolsters popular support in that city for things remaining the way they are.