5 ms·
It sounds like the author isn't really interested in named branches, but rather postpone the push of his work-in-progress that's on the default branch. You don'
by idank 14y ago
It sounds like the author isn't really interested in named branches, but rather postpone the push of his work-in-progress that's on the default branch. You don't need anything fancy for that, and certainly not rebase.
Mercurial has so-called anonymous branches, so all he needs to do is 'hg update' to the commit preceding his work on feature A, start work on feature B (will result in two heads on the default branch) and then push only those changes by specifying the -r flag to push.