4 ms·
I think that's what jevinskie was implying, as in this is a non issue since service hooks are already established so there is no reason bots should be allowed,
by uxp 14y ago
I think that's what jevinskie was implying, as in this is a non issue since service hooks are already established so there is no reason bots should be allowed, they should plug into the correct API.
- masklinn 14y ago> I think that's what jevinskie was implying I'm not sure he'd have written that he "likes the idea" and would have failed to mention Service Hooks if he did.
- uxp 14y agoI read his comment as either sarcasm or passive aggressiveness. "Wouldn't it be a great idea if there was a 'hook' mechanism you could opt into that provides a way to add additional functionality to their site from third parties?" Or maybe not. I don't know, text doesn't convey emotion and body language.