The ability to disable secure boot only applies to x86, and even there your stance has issues. I wish people would stop repeating this like its some kind of ir

The ability to disable secure boot only applies to x86, and even there your stance has issues. I wish people would stop repeating this like its some kind of iron clad gaurentee, Microsoft only changed the reqirement to begin with after there was a public outcry, and are free to change it again any time. (they likely will after more systems support secure boot) also please consider the fact that how you should be able to disable secure boot is entirely unspecified. If early models are any indication, its going to be buggy and error prone on tons of systems.