4 ms·
A raw 1080p movie at 24fps would require a 1.5 Gb/s connection, and I am pretty sure there aren't any lossless video codecs out there. Low-bitrate HD content s
by nemothekid 14y ago
A raw 1080p movie at 24fps would require a 1.5 Gb/s connection, and I am pretty sure there aren't any lossless video codecs out there.
Low-bitrate HD content sucks.
- gizmo686 14y agoNot nessarilly. The majority of possible videos are highly improbable, so from an information theory standpoint, it should be possible to have lossless video compression.
- rb2k_ 14y ago> I am pretty sure there aren't any lossless video codecs out there Oh, there are a lot. Back when I still recorded TV from an analog capture card I e.g. used http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huffyuv http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huffyuv I also recall http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSU_Lossless_Video_Codec http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSU_Lossless_Video_Codec and http://lags.leetcode.net/codec.html http://lags.leetcode.net/codec.html having a userbase. When looking at newer codecs, Dirac has a "pro" mode that is lossless (http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/projects/dirac/diracpro.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/projects/dirac/diracpro.shtml) and so do x264 and SNOW (http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=SNOW http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=SNOW)