> billed as a call for discussion about sexism I'm curious why some people seem to think that she is exclusively talking about or attributing her problems to s

> billed as a call for discussion about sexism I'm curious why some people seem to think that she is exclusively talking about or attributing her problems to sexism. The very first sentence: > Some parts of this article deal with misogyny, sexism, and harassment, while other aspects of it respond to experiences of down-right douche-baggery. ...explicitly states that sexism is only part of the discussion. Was this edited at some point after publishing? Perhaps some readers not carefully perusing, or some combination thereof.