5 ms·
Checking with some people here, it's actually more complicated than this: what I described is true for IE9 and below, but for Firefox, Chrome, and IE10 measured
by cbr 14y ago
Checking with some people here, it's actually more complicated than this: what I described is true for IE9 and below, but for Firefox, Chrome, and IE10 measured page load time will include execution of these deferred scripts.
- xpose2000 14y agoI appreciate the responses and updated the article with links to your comments. I've been very impressed by what I've seen so far! I was going to include Google Analytics site speed data, but it seemed less accurate than NewRelic's Real User Monitoring.
- cbr 14y agoWhat seemed less accurate? They should be doing almost exactly the same thing.
- briandoll 14y agoGoogle Analytics site speed data is only based on 1%[1] of your traffic while New Relic's Real User Monitoring aims to track all of your traffic. I'm sure that can lead to differences in accuracy. (Disclosure: I used to work for New Relic) [1] https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/gajs/gaTrackingTiming#sampleRate https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection...
- mh- 14y agoProvided you have enough traffic, sampling shouldn't affect the results in any meaningful way.