> Because we can't observe the counterfactual world, this actually is just an assumption. If you discard all empirical claims categorically due to "inability t

> Because we can't observe the counterfactual world, this actually is just an assumption. If you discard all empirical claims categorically due to "inability to observe the counterfactual world", your own reasoning falls apart. Why would you assume people mean what they say? > Diving their intention also still requires many assumptions about their intermediate beliefs that I find dubious You're assuming CEOs of multi-billion dollar companies are honest. I find that dubious.