3 ms·
doesn't HAM radio already have a digital packet system that works like fidonet store-and-forward system? this just adds an encryption layer?
by ck2 5d ago
doesn't HAM radio already have a digital packet system that works like fidonet store-and-forward system?
this just adds an encryption layer?
- wmf 5d agoAX.25 runs at 300 bps over HF while Mercury is 10x faster.
- fragmede 5d agoHAM radio isn't allowed to have encryption. (Someone can write a longer comment on why thats wrong.)
- _whiteCaps_ 5d agoDepends on your jurisdiction. In Canada it's allowed if you publish your keys. https://www.rac.ca/encryption/ https://www.rac.ca/encryption/
- tarxvf 5d agohttps://n5dux.com/ham/files/pdf/Data%20Encryption%20is%20Legal.pdf https://n5dux.com/ham/files/pdf/Data%20Encryption%20is%20Leg...
- BlandDuck 5d agoHam radio also has the FT8 protocol which is optimized for bad signal to noise environments, but has low bandwidth. However, using this protocol a 10Watt radio has global reach under the right conditions, which is pretty mind boggling. About encryption, the US rules are that you can use digital protocols but you must publish the specs so anyone can, in principle, decode the signal.
- cge 5d ago>the US rules are that you can use digital protocols but you must publish the specs so anyone can, in principle, decode the signal. This restriction does not appear to actually be enforced, eg, if I recall correctly the VARA HF/FM modes do not have published specs anywhere near sufficient to decode them, to the point where there are projects trying to reverse engineer them.