2 ms·
> Toyota and Honda have competitors that are pretty interchangeable, like each other. Do any of these competitors build "machines that can last" as much as Toy
by throw0101c 5d ago
> Toyota and Honda have competitors that are pretty interchangeable, like each other.
Do any of these competitors build "machines that can last" as much as Toyota and Honda? Does any other manufacturer have a longevity reputation of either of these two? What are the depreciation schedules of competitors (AIUI, T/H hold their value pretty well)?
- mahboi 5d agoToyota and Honda have each other as direct competitors. If one of them sacrifices reliability, it's over. There are also second tier ones like Nissan making interchangeable cars, so if say Toyota stoops to Nissan's level, then they have to start selling at Nissan prices. I would also say Ford, but their reputation for reliability applies only to their trucks.
- WesolyKubeczek 5d agoFunny that Honda's hybrids seem to be licensing Toyota's eCVT magic, so it's quite a bit like Apple and Samsung, where they would be filling each other's pockets while also being at each other's throat.
- NobodyNada 5d agoHonda's hybrids are their own thing. They're mostly-series hybrids with one or two direct-drive gears for cruising speeds, as opposed to Toyota's parallel hybrid system.
- DwarvenEngineer 5d agowdym? Honda's hyrid technology is very different from what Toyota has architecturally
- SoftTalker 5d agoWhen Ford and Mazda were working together they had some pretty reliable cars. My Focus outlasted two Hondas that I owned. The Hondas were "nicer" cars in terms of features and interior but mechanically the Ford kicked their asses.
- mahboi 5d agoYeah, there was an era of good Focuses, also the Crown Vic. Crown Vic is probably their only car a random person will see and assume it's reliable, in the US at least.