3 ms·
I expect the next Anthropic release to finally reduce the prevalence of Claudish
by atniomn 12d ago
I expect the next Anthropic release to finally reduce the prevalence of Claudish
- sscaryterry 12d agoBased on?
- moojacob 12d agoIf they fix Claudish, they've earned me back as a max customer! Fable 5.1 is not there quite there yet. They need to get that Sonnet 3.5 magic back.
- rfgplk 12d agoSame. The issue with Anthropics models is that (speaking regarding code generation) they REFUSE any kind of comment override instructions. I've tried everything and no matter what, after a few turns, they resort to generating the same overtly verbose junk. Bun's codebase is littered with them See // `HANDLE` is an opaque kernel handle (kernel32 validates and returns 0/FALSE // on a non-console handle); every out-param is `&mut T` to a `#[repr(C)]` POD, // ABI-identical to the Win32 `LP*` pointer (thin non-null). The reference type // encodes the only pointer-validity precondition, so `safe fn` discharges the // link-time proof. (`bun_windows_sys::kernel32` declares these with `*mut`; // redeclared locally so the legacy-conhost cursor path below is plain calls.) or // Progress's terminal handle is the canonical `output::File` (vtable-backed // stderr/File from `OutputSinkVTable`). The duplicate `ProgressTerminalVTable` // from B-0 round 1 is removed; tty/ansi/winsize route through the new // `OutputSinkVTable` slots so `bun_core` stays T0 (no `bun_sys` dep). from src/bun_core/Progress.rs