2 ms·

I tried in Omp (Oh-my-pi), and so far it's really problematic. It will loop in thinking mode ("Let me implement those fixes: Fix 1, Fix 2, Fix 3 .... Fix 80, F

I tried in Omp (Oh-my-pi), and so far it's really problematic. It will loop in thinking mode ("Let me implement those fixes: Fix 1, Fix 2, Fix 3 .... Fix 80, Fix 81"), ignore the AGENTS.md instructions, corrupt plan files, etc etc... I have 5.6 Sol as advisor/watchdog, and it blocks every turn, I never saw this. Quite a shame, 4.6 wasn't so bad.

xmorse 12d ago
OMP is a joke. don't use that garbage
- Saline9515 12d ago
  Can you explain your opinion? I'm curious but such vague comments won't convince me.
  - samtheprogram 12d ago
    Probably the same reason as oh-my-zsh, you don't need 90% of it. Further compounding the problem in an agent harness is that you are polluting the context window by throwing the kitchen sink at it.
    - marwatk 12d ago
      I've been experimenting with omp because: - it allows different models within one session via roles (I only have API, so pay per token) - it's much more likely (ime) to use the LSP over grep for determining how code fits together But I agree a 20k+ starting context is way overkill. I find it's very hard to get information on harnesses people are using. I have to stay model agnostic so I avoid claude, codex, cursor, etc. I've used and tried opencode, which worked well, but obviously lacks the above features. Does anyone have a resource for following what people are actually being productive with? With so much vibe going on it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff.
  - xmorse 12d ago
    this summarizes the average OMP user and dev https://x.com/greg_horvay/status/2100764473392820433?s=20 https://x.com/greg_horvay/status/2100764473392820433?s=20
    - raincole 12d ago
      What a crazy thread lol. I really can't tell who is serious and who isn't there.
- unrvl22 12d ago
  you are a joke if you think omp is a joke.
- polytely 12d ago
  what do you use and why do you prefer it over omp
  - raincole 12d ago
    Just pi. `pi install` the packages you actually need or ask LLM to write a package for you. Keeping the harness minimal is the point of pi.

xmorse 12d ago

OMP is a joke. don't use that garbage

Saline9515 12d ago
Can you explain your opinion? I'm curious but such vague comments won't convince me.
- samtheprogram 12d ago
  Probably the same reason as oh-my-zsh, you don't need 90% of it. Further compounding the problem in an agent harness is that you are polluting the context window by throwing the kitchen sink at it.
  - marwatk 12d ago
    I've been experimenting with omp because: - it allows different models within one session via roles (I only have API, so pay per token) - it's much more likely (ime) to use the LSP over grep for determining how code fits together But I agree a 20k+ starting context is way overkill. I find it's very hard to get information on harnesses people are using. I have to stay model agnostic so I avoid claude, codex, cursor, etc. I've used and tried opencode, which worked well, but obviously lacks the above features. Does anyone have a resource for following what people are actually being productive with? With so much vibe going on it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff.
- xmorse 12d ago
  this summarizes the average OMP user and dev https://x.com/greg_horvay/status/2100764473392820433?s=20 https://x.com/greg_horvay/status/2100764473392820433?s=20
  - raincole 12d ago
    What a crazy thread lol. I really can't tell who is serious and who isn't there.
unrvl22 12d ago
you are a joke if you think omp is a joke.
polytely 12d ago
what do you use and why do you prefer it over omp
- raincole 12d ago
  Just pi. `pi install` the packages you actually need or ask LLM to write a package for you. Keeping the harness minimal is the point of pi.