3 ms·
>When Uber's driverless car killed someone they got off pretty easy: The driverless car that very much had a safety driver, which got distracted because she wa
by gruez 5d ago
>When Uber's driverless car killed someone they got off pretty easy:
The driverless car that very much had a safety driver, which got distracted because she was watching TV shows on her phone?
- chadgpt8 5d agoHow well would you handle being paid to do nothing without distractions, 8 hours every day?
- mrguyorama 5d agoThe driverless car which, as well as having an insufficient and negligent safety driver (a regime that the Air Transport and Train industries would be happy to provide the hundred years worth of evidence that allows us to know ahead of time that this is not going to work), also had safety devices disabled. The point being, you shouldn't be allowed to just hand off liability to someone you know won't handle it. I don't care what you put in any contract, hiring someone should not be a get out of liability free card. You should be on the hook for putting in the effort required to be confident that liability is managed well. You should in fact not be allowed to do something dangerous, but say you were not liable because the danger was someone else's responsibility. No! The danger was your responsibility, no matter who you hire to manage it!