> You said Yes, which you didn't respond to until now. > And that’s far too broad in my opinion. Similarly, it's far too broad to say that it's "much less er

> You said Yes, which you didn't respond to until now. > And that’s far too broad in my opinion. Similarly, it's far too broad to say that it's "much less error prone" to use a more general allocation strategy. Clearly we both make unspoken assumptions, but in the context of this discussion on Zig, where you initially responded to an example written in Zig, I think you actually understood what I meant.