I would say most of these look pretty good but most of them miss the important information except maybe 5. 3 has most of the information but some of it is hard

I would say most of these look pretty good but most of them miss the important information except maybe 5. 3 has most of the information but some of it is hard to see. I would say this is a pretty good way to showcase what is wrong with image generation in AI in general: impressive visually but missing the basics (here complete and readable information). I have been playing around with Google flow generating scenes with animals characters and the fur always look incredible. Same goes for the facial expressions but the generation is comically bad in scene continuity, even in the same scene. It's not uncommon for characters to lose/acquire features or objects from one moment to another (like losing glasses, but they reappear a few seconds later). For a lack of a better term, I would call this the "golden turd" effect.