I agree. There's definitely value in it. But I think you put it well that the problem is making it all accompanying. e.g. > Something that people learn quickl

I agree. There's definitely value in it. But I think you put it well that the problem is making it all accompanying. e.g. > Something that people learn quickly when they work with me is that my approach to pretty much every problem is: The overall sentiment is good, positive and actionable (think, do informed things intentionally, understand things well) but I feel like the tone tries to make it all accompanying and somewhat unquestionable, which is confusing for an article titled "I am often wrong" that ends with "I am open to changing it". > They beat a lack of them, for me. I generally agree, but I feel like there's a midground where we acknowledge positive, productive motivation, whilst also acknowledging that it is not how normal humans go around talking about their normal day to day activities. I feel I only see this stuff in environments where people are expected to be pushed to the point of being uncomfortable, and to be okay with it. There's a time and a place for that. I think it's not always sustainable, but that's not always understood/believed by younger engineers/younger me (and younger you?) I think without that nuance, things like this will always be criticised/torn apart by people not currently in that kinda zone.