If it definitely had to be market value, then the law probably would've been worded differently? It says the compensation is determined as a balance of public

If it definitely had to be market value, then the law probably would've been worded differently? It says the compensation is determined as a balance of public good and the interests of those affected, so to me it does read like the compensation can be lower than market value so it'd all come down the courts to determine how much below the market value the state can get away with.