3 ms·
> Those peasants could have tried their luck planting a field in the middle of nowhere, far from any village. Except not really. Peasants were considered the p
by DanHulton 5d ago
> Those peasants could have tried their luck planting a field in the middle of nowhere, far from any village.
Except not really. Peasants were considered the property of their lords. If they decided to go and “try their luck” at a neutral location and that was reported to their lord, armed men on horseback would be very likely to show up not long after, to return them back to the lord’s land, but not without a solid beating and/or maiming first.
Sometimes, certain forms of civilization just are oppressive, rather than collaborative. They tend to be out-competed by forms that are less oppressive, true, but it’s not guaranteed and not always fast and not always permanent.
- modo_mario 5d agoTypically that was not the case as far as I'm aware. It's why the black plague gave them so much leverage. They could go to a different lord. But often the land belonged to the lords or at least they could take it within their region at their pleasing. There were not that much "neutral locations". That wilderness was common land or hunting grounds belonging to someone.