3 ms·

Web 3.0 - static content? ;)

• lumberjack 14y ago
  That or it's anti-thesis of sorts, i.e. websites that are rendered almost entirely on the client side.
  • debacle 14y ago
    Websites are already rendered entirely client side.
    • RyanZAG 14y ago
      I think he is referring to having the clients download a copy of the database and a big chunk of javascript to create views and forms to use the database. Syncing the database with the server at specified intervals, etc. Maybe that can be Web 4.0 - Any ideas for Web 5.0? ;)
• polymathist 14y ago
  Perhaps. It would be pretty ironic, no? In the early days of the web everything was static content. Would be interesting to make a move back in that direction. Of course, this only works for a small subset of websites that don't need dynamic content. I believe most major sites cache their static assets (images, css, js) in a cdn while relying on a dynamic webserver for changing content.