2 ms·
"doesn't have a public interest defence". Can't be serious.
by unsungNovelty 16d ago
"doesn't have a public interest defence".
Can't be serious.
- firesteelrain 16d agoThere isn’t one under the law so no. Why wasn’t the whistleblower process followed? Why didn’t he try to contact his congressman/ senator ? He could have said I don’t want a clearance anymore and disclosed his concerns. He could have reported anonymously even. He wanted public debate and discourse on something that the process didn’t allow
- unsungNovelty 16d agoWhat he exposed was found illegal by US courts. And the govt had to stop it. What more evidence do you want?
- lern_too_spel 16d agoA single program he leaked was illegal. The vast majority was not, including the hacking of Chinese targets that he leaked directly to SCMP.
- deleted 15d ago[deleted]