4 ms·
Well, trying to make RSI for one so humans don't have to do that work. LLMs are still a very new technology in relation to human timeliness. There is a whole l
by pixl97 12d ago
Well, trying to make RSI for one so humans don't have to do that work.
LLMs are still a very new technology in relation to human timeliness. There is a whole lot of exploration to be done.
- saghm 12d agoI mean, in relation to human timelines, so are computers in general. It's not close why you think that this is unique to LLMs.
- pixl97 12d agoThere might be some confusion on your part on just how much AI compute has been installed in the past few years in relation to the total amount of CPU compute and the speed at which it was installed. If the CPUs life was an hour, the GPU AI accelerator would have been around 5 minutes and is around 5x larger in total compute. It should not be underestimated in any way the scale of what is occurring.
- deleted 12d ago[deleted]
- saghm 12d agoNo, I think the confusion on your part is around what it sounds like when you say "in relation to human timelines". Humans have been here for around a million years. We've been living in cities for several thousand. It sounds like what you're actually comparing to is AI computing to pre-AI computing, which is reasonable, but I don't really see how that is accurately described by "in relation to human timelines".