The other way around, Spanish uses the definite article where English would not: • Tengo los ojos azules -> I have blue eyes (not I have the blue eyes) • Jueg

The other way around, Spanish uses the definite article where English would not: • Tengo los ojos azules -> I have blue eyes (not I have the blue eyes) • Juego el tenis -> I play tennis (not I play the tennis) Though as with the indefinite article, at least there is no discrepancy between single/plural. In part it is necessary because there are some words that don't vary their spelling in different genders but do have different meaning: • la papa -> the potato, el papa -> the pope (also el papá -> the dad) • la capital -> the capital (as in city), el capital -> the capital (as in money) • la corte -> the court, el corte -> the cut [I had to look those up to check, I'd have had cut/court back-to-front otherwise!] Another thing that doesn't exist in English is an equivalent to the “personal a”: vi a Fred -> I saw Fred, vi cuatro gatos -> I saw four cats (both languages use a definite or indefinite article for a single non-personal subject: vi un gato / vi el gato -> I saw a cat / I saw the cat). I suppose it could be said that Spanish is more consistent here too: there is always something in that position for simple forms, be it a count, an article, or a. I say “for simple forms” as there is nothing there for thing like “vi oscuridad en sus ojos” -> I saw darkness in his/her eyes (though in both languages either definite or indefinite article would also work but might suggest different emphasis: I saw a darkness in… / I saw the darkness in…).