3 ms·
go is even more straightforward for llms imo. It's a dead simple language with a good garbage collector, where you can still do a lot memory management
by hollowturtle 12d ago
go is even more straightforward for llms imo. It's a dead simple language with a good garbage collector, where you can still do a lot memory management
- Havoc 12d agoSimplicity is a feature too. > you can still do a lot memory management That’s kinda my point - you don’t really want to trust the LLM to get any sort of memory management right. A system where hard constraints are baked into the language itself and the LLM fights the compiler at compile time removes a lot of hoping the LLM got it right. Ultimately either works though so use whatever you enjoy