3 ms·
maybe but as a paper writer, the quality of reviews and reviewers have gone down because of LLM-as-a-reviewer too, because LLM reviews seem to regurgitate the l
by amdivia 12d ago
maybe but as a paper writer, the quality of reviews and reviewers have gone down because of LLM-as-a-reviewer too, because LLM reviews seem to regurgitate the limitations section of the paper, and are highly influenced by the way things are phrased in the paper rather than the actual substance.
but I'm hopeful that some middle ground will be found in the future
- sgt101 12d agoI dunno man, I use LLM's to review things before I send them in and I often feel like I've been handcuffed to a chair, had a bright light shone in my face and had to account for all the mistakes I've made in my life. They can be brutal.
- robwwilliams 12d agoCompletely agree. I’ve had a Nature paper and a Nature Neuroscience paper published this year and the reviews from Opus were much more thorough and complete than those of the human reviewers. I still benefitted from the human reviewers, but now I consider an LLM review essential.