3 ms·
Not all all. It merely indicates that this is an strict logic approach to the topic. https://commonplacefacts.com/2022/07/27/principia-mathematica-300-page-pro
by Shorel 6d ago
Not all all. It merely indicates that this is an strict logic approach to the topic.
https://commonplacefacts.com/2022/07/27/principia-mathematica-300-page-proof-one-plus-one-equals-two/ https://commonplacefacts.com/2022/07/27/principia-mathematic...
- applfanboysbgon 6d agoWhat part of GP's one-sentence explanation is not strictly logical? Does obfuscating a simple logical concept by describing it in academia-wanky-terms like Liskov's Substitution Principle make it More Logical? Or does it just make the author and their in-crowd feel more intelligent? Note, also, that the article isn't even objective. It asserts that the definition of a subtype is Liskov's principle. However, Liskov's principle is only one of multiple possible definitions. In other words, the article is really only invoking Liskov's name as an appeal to authority. So much for strict logic.
- pestatije 6d agointelligence is overrated
- zkmon 6d agoIf the article is written for human consumption, then it fails the primary goal (or logic?) of being useful. If a human has to digest a flood of this logic slop just to get convinced about this simple concept, they are not going to be able to do anything useful.