4 ms·
"attempted govt regulation is not the answer" Self-regulation? None at all?
by f30e3dfed1c9 14d ago
"attempted govt regulation is not the answer"
Self-regulation? None at all?
- OutOfHere 14d agoThere already exist laws against hacking. Legal damages already can apply. Further laws aren't necessary and will only suppress open-weight AI firms, making the monopoly of large AI firms more entrenched. See the first comment (by Brett Matson) on the archive link of the WSJ article.
- iAMkenough 14d agoI think we need an AI sheriff that aggressively enforces the law. The current level of enforcement and the fine schedule is not enough of a deterrent to prevent these large corporations from breaking existing laws. Frequently make an example of them and you’ll be hailed a hero by the general populous.