> That's about the closest value you'll find to what human life is economically valued at Again, that has nothing to do with what you are trying to make it mea

> That's about the closest value you'll find to what human life is economically valued at Again, that has nothing to do with what you are trying to make it mean. > Do you have an alternate measure that is grounded in anything? What? That is completely unrelated to this article and my post, I already clarified what that figured was for -- why are you stuck on this as determining a human lifes economical value? If that topic is near and dear to you for reasons you chose to keep hidden, I can understand why its got you bent, but this is not a relevant thread to air those personal grievances.