2 ms·
>which necessarily involves absolutely no judicial oversight ISPs already have policies that you can't use them for piracy and it is trivial for an ISP to see
by charcircuit 6d ago
>which necessarily involves absolutely no judicial oversight
ISPs already have policies that you can't use them for piracy and it is trivial for an ISP to see that a site is being used for piracy. A manual check can be done within 30 minutes.
>This resulted in them taking down things like Cloudflare, Google Drive, and the Italian government.
This sounds more like Cloudflare and Google Drive are harboring pirates. There should be similar takedown processes and having suspicious accounts separated onto distinct IPs from higher trusted ones to avoid actions like this affecting non pirates.
- mitxela 6d agoGo design and implement that system. A whole country couldn't. Remember you have to respect rule of law, that means no wiretapping without a warrant.
- charcircuit 6d agoThe system already exists. It's called email and these ISPs already have abuse emails they respond to. You don't need a wiretap to know that 123moviesclone.su is hosting pirated content. You can simply visit it and tell in 2 seconds.
- mitxela 6d agoOkay. The IP address is cloudflare. What should the ISP do about it. Block IP address or block DNS, those are the options?
- charcircuit 6d agoBlock the Cloudflare IP it's on if Cloudflare does not act on the abuse complaint.
- mitxela 6d agoOk you have blocked half the internet in your country - including its own government. Does this make you more or less popular with voters? The libertarian party promises to end the stupid internet blocking, will they win the next election?