3 ms·
Specifically, it can micro across multiple screens of engagement in a way that we can't as easily.
by chrishare 14d ago
Specifically, it can micro across multiple screens of engagement in a way that we can't as easily.
- stephbook 13d agoStarCraft is just not a good benchmark exactly for these reasons: Endless complaining about the bots not being limited in the way humans are. "Oh it's able to issue commands too fast." "Oh no, I give it full map access and it uses that." Ego shooters are, naturally, also not good benchmarks. OpenAI won DotA2 in 2019, a way better game.
- monster_truck 13d agodota wouldn't exist without Aeon of Strife (the UMS map from Starcraft that was later reworked into WC3 dota)
- Forgeties79 13d agoIt’s not “endless complaining” when the bot is functionally cheating. Yes if you let a computer use special mechanisms it will operate faster than a person who is using a mouse and a keyboard. A computer computers better than a person, what a revelation. I don’t applaud people using aim assist in CS for the same reason. We literally don’t have access to the same tools. That’s why chess has been such a great target for years. One’s ability to manipulate the pieces has no bearing.