4 ms·
> the hollow attention they crave It’s their job, their source of income (or they’re aspiring to it). Making bait thumbnails is a necessary evil. If they don’t
by phoghed 7d ago
> the hollow attention they crave
It’s their job, their source of income (or they’re aspiring to it). Making bait thumbnails is a necessary evil. If they don’t they’re leaving money on the table for no reason.
If they AB test some thumbnails and the AI ones get more views/engagement then of course they are going to do that.
I think the overall premise of “if AI thumbnails are even getting more engagement, it must be from haters” is faulty to begin with. It just fits your personal narrative. We simply don’t know.
- dspillett 7d agoPeers Morgan's source of income, and hence his job, is being rage bait in (vaguely) human form. A pound shop Alex Jones. It's being his job doesn't mean I have to respect it, or him. See also: loan sharks, living statues, influencers generally.
- phoghed 7d agoWho said anything about you personally respecting anyone?
- dspillett 7d ago>> the hollow attention they crave > It’s their job, their source of income You seemed to be reacting to my low opinion of the practices of attention dredgers, as if I'm bad for holding that opinion and a should respect all career choices and income generation attempts. Perhaps I read that quite wrong.
- phoghed 7d ago> as if I’m bad I didn’t say anything like that, you pulled that feeling out of yourself. I’m just pointing out that they are doing it for money. Most white collar workers are using AI as part of their job these days.